RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-led medication regimen simplification using a structured approach can reduce unnecessary medication regimen complexity in residential aged care facilities (RACFs), but no studies have investigated simplification by different health professionals, nor the extent to which simplification is recommended during comprehensive medication reviews. OBJECTIVES: To compare medication regimen simplification opportunities identified by pharmacists, general medical practitioners (GPs), and geriatricians and to determine if pharmacists identified simplification opportunities during routinely conducted comprehensive medication reviews in RACFs for these same residents. METHODS: Three pharmacists, three GPs and three geriatricians independently applied the Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) to medication data for 83 residents taking medications at least twice daily. Interrater agreement was calculated using Fleiss's kappa. Pharmacist medication review reports for the same 83 residents were then examined to identify if the pharmacists conducting these reviews had recommended any of the simplification strategies. RESULTS: Overall, 77 residents (92.8 %) taking medications at least twice daily could have their medication regimen simplified by at least one health professional. Pharmacists independently simplified 53.0-77.1 % of medication regimens (Κ = 0.60, 95%CI 0.46-0.75, indicating substantial agreement), while GPs simplified 74.7-89.2 % (Κ = 0.44, 95%CI 0.24-0.64, moderate agreement) and geriatricians simplified 41.0-66.3 % (Κ = 0.30, 95%CI 0.16-0.44, fair agreement). No simplification recommendations were included in the reports previously prepared by pharmacists as part of the comprehensive medication reviews undertaken for these residents. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists, GPs, and geriatricians can all identify medication regimen simplification opportunities, although these opportunities differ within and between professional groups. Although opportunities to simplify medication regimens during comprehensive medication reviews exist, simplification is not currently routinely recommended by pharmacists performing these reviews in Australian RACFs.
RESUMO
Objective/Process: In June of 2022, the State of Maryland Board of Pharmacy issued regulations permitting pharmacist administration of maintenance injectable medications. Subsequently, the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy created a laboratory to train student pharmacists based on these regulations on administering long-acting maintenance injections. This training included a review of regulations, reconstitution and administration of medications, and education for patients and caregivers on long-acting injectable medications. This is the first training the authors are aware of incorporating both reconstitution and administration of these medications. The objective of this paper is to describe the laboratory details and future directions of the training course. Results/Conclusions: The first training laboratory trained 94 student pharmacists in the administration technique of long-acting injectable medications. The program has been adapted for practicing pharmacists and other healthcare providers. Thus far, more than 300 practitioners have participated in the learning lab.
RESUMO
Introduction: Healthcare professionals' awareness of adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance practices differ by country. The study assesses healthcare professionals' knowledge, practice, and potential barriers to pharmacovigilance-related practices and reporting adverse drug reaction. Methods: A cross-sectional investigation was conducted in government and private healthcare settings. The study included licensed physicians, pharmacists, and nurses. To examine knowledge, practice, and potential barriers to pharmacovigilance-related practices and adverse drug reaction reporting, a 22-item validated questionnaire was used. Results: The final analysis included 311 healthcare professionals. Most healthcare professionals, 59% (N = 182), mentioned encountering patients with adverse drug reactions during the last year. On the other hand, most healthcare professionals, 54% (n = 167), mentioned that they had not reported adverse drug reactions. A good proportion of respondents mentioned that it is essential to report adverse drug reactions (N = 288, 92.6%), availability of adverse drug reactions reporting forms in practice sites (N = 216, 69.5%), had awareness regarding how to report adverse drug reactions (N = 221, 71.1%), the necessity of reporting minor/less important adverse drug reactions (N = 265, 85.2%), and were trained on how to report adverse drug reactions (N = 201, 64.6%). Adverse drug reaction reporting program in the United Arab Emirates (N = 148, 47.6) was known to many healthcare professionals. Lack of time was the major impediment to reporting adverse drug reactions at 42.7% (N = 133). The predictor variable work experience does add to the model (p < 0.05) concerning association with filling of adverse drug reaction forms (Estimate = 0.380; SE = 0.452; p = 0.400), professional role (Estimate = 0.454; SE = 0.673; p = 0.500). In addition, the predictor variable practice setting adds to the model (p < 0.05) concerning the knowledge regarding the availability of adverse drug reaction reporting forms (Estimate = -1.229; SE = 0.298; p = 0.000), training on how to report adverse drug reactions (Estimate = -0.660; SE = 0.294; p = 0.025), and awareness regarding the adverse drug reaction reporting program in the United Arab Emirates (Estimate = -1.032; SE = 0.280; p = 0.000). Conclusion: Pharmacists had the most knowledge regarding adverse drug reaction reporting and pharmacovigilance. The underreporting of adverse drug reactions was documented among physicians and nurses. Lack of time was the most significant barrier to reporting adverse drug reactions, followed by uncertainty and complicated adverse drug reaction documentation forms.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: ChatGPT is a conversational artificial intelligence (AI) technology that has shown application in various facets of healthcare. With the increased use of AI, it is imperative to assess the accuracy and comprehensibility of AI platforms. OBJECTIVE: This pilot project aimed to assess the understandability, readability, and accuracy of ChatGPT as a source of medication-related patient education as compared with an evidence-based medicine tertiary reference resource, LexiComp®. METHODS: Patient education materials (PEMs) were obtained from ChatGPT and LexiComp® for eight common medications (albuterol, apixaban, atorvastatin, hydrocodone/acetaminophen, insulin glargine, levofloxacin, omeprazole, and sacubitril/valsartan). PEMs were extracted, blinded, and assessed by two investigators independently. The primary outcome was a comparison of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-printable (PEMAT-P). Secondary outcomes included Flesch reading ease, Flesch Kincaid grade level, percent passive sentences, word count, and accuracy. A 7-item accuracy checklist for each medication was generated by expert consensus among pharmacist investigators, with LexiComp® PEMs serving as the control. PEMAT-P interrater reliability was determined via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Flesch reading ease, Flesch Kincaid grade level, percent passive sentences, and word count were calculated by Microsoft® Word®. Continuous data were assessed using the Student's t-test via SPSS (version 20.0). RESULTS: No difference was found in the PEMAT-P understandability score of PEMs produced by ChatGPT versus LexiComp® [77.9% (11.0) vs. 72.5% (2.4), P=0.193]. Reading level was higher with ChatGPT [8.6 (1.2) vs. 5.6 (0.3), P<0.001). ChatGPT PEMs had a lower percentage of passive sentences and lower word count. The average accuracy score of ChatGPT PEMs was 4.25/7 (61%), with scores ranging from 29-86%. CONCLUSION: Despite comparable PEMAT-P scores, ChatGPT PEMs did not meet grade level targets. Lower word count and passive text with ChatGPT PEMs could benefit patients, but the variable accuracy scores prevent routine use of ChatGPT to produce medication-related PEMs at this time.
RESUMO
In 2017, a severe shortage of infusion bags resulted in a paradigm change in medication administration practice from intermittent infusion to intravenous push. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices proposed safe practice guidelines for adult intravenous push medications. A different study showed that ready-to-administer medication prepared in the sterile area of a pharmacy reduces the risk of harm, nurses' time for medication administration and the cost of medications. Based on the recommendation of the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, we decided to conduct a pilot study on the implementation of sterile compounding and administration of intravenous push medication in adult patients admitted to the hospital. In the study, the stability of five intravenous push antibiotic syringes was also determined in the syringes.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos, Seringas, Centros de Atenção Terciária, Humanos, Seringas/normas, Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem, Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico, Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração, Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos, Projetos Piloto, Adulto, Administração Intravenosa/métodos, Estabilidade de Medicamentos, Infusões Intravenosas/métodos, Infusões Intravenosas/instrumentação, Infusões Intravenosas/normasRESUMO
Introduction: Understanding the latest guideline recommendations is crucial for healthcare professionals to apply statin therapy effectively. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention in enhancing the awareness and understanding of physicians and pharmacists concerning risk assessment of Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and the role of statin therapy. Methods: This pre- and post-intervention study was conducted in Sana'a, Yemen's capital city, at the University of Science and Technology Hospital. The study was done between 11/2021-12/2021, and two separate educational sessions were held. The McNemar's test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were employed as necessary. Results: Participants' awareness of the Framingham CVD risk calculator improved significantly from 40.4% pre-intervention to 78.7% post-intervention. Similarly, understanding of the parameters used in the 10-year ASCVD Risk calculator rose from 46.8% pre-intervention to 76.6% post-intervention. The ability to identify high, moderate, and low-intensity statin therapy, for instance, increased from 34% to 63.8% post-intervention. Regarding statins' contraindications, safety, and efficacy monitoring parameters, pre-intervention knowledge was unsatisfactory, and the educational intervention improved it significantly (p <0.05). For physicians, the median ASCVD risk assessment knowledge score was significantly improved from 4 (IQR = 3-5) pre-intervention to 7 (6.25-8) immediately post-intervention, while the statin therapy clinical knowledge median score significantly improved from 3 (1.25-6.5) to 9 (7.25-14.75) post-education intervention, p-values were 0.002 and 0.003; respectively. For pharmacists, a similar significant improvement (p <0.05) in the overall knowledge scores for both ASCVD risk assessment and statin therapy was noted. Conclusion: The educational intervention improved participants' knowledge of statin therapy and ASCVD risk assessment. Therefore, further education lectures and training programs through continuing medical education on the up-to-date guidelines' recommendations should be regularly implemented to raise awareness and improve the clinical knowledge and appropriateness of statins use in clinical settings. .
RESUMO
Background: Prior research capturing pharmacists' perspectives on the discharge process has shown that their involvement is essential. Given the multidisciplinary nature of the hospital environment, it is important to understand the perspectives of nonpharmacist health care providers. Objectives: To explore the perspectives of nonpharmacist health care providers concerning current discharge practices, components of an effective discharge plan, and perceived barriers to an optimal discharge, and to explore their expectations of pharmacists at discharge. Methods: This qualitative study used key informant interviews of allied health professionals and prescribers at Vancouver General Hospital and North Island Hospital Comox Valley (British Columbia). Participants primarily working on general medicine, family practice, or hospitalist wards were invited to participate. Results: A total of 16 health care providers participated, consisting of 12 allied health professionals and 4 prescribers. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts revealed 5 themes for each group. The following 3 themes were common to both groups: systems-related barriers to an optimal discharge; patient- and community-related barriers to an optimal discharge; and patient involvement and education. For allied health professionals, themes of prioritization of patients for discharge and direct communication/teamwork were also key for an optimal discharge. Prescriber-specific themes were limitations related to technology infrastructure and inefficiency of existing collaborative processes. Key responsibilities expected of the pharmacist at discharge included preparing the discharge medication reconciliation and prescriptions, addressing medication-related cost concerns, organizing adherence aids/tools, and providing medication counselling. Conclusions: Further studies are warranted to investigate optimization of the discharge process through implementation of standardized discharge protocols and electronic health record-related tools. The primary responsibilities of the pharmacist at discharge, as perceived by study participants, were consistent with previous literature.
Contexte: Des recherches antérieures recueillant le point de vue de pharmaciens sur le processus associé au congé de l'hôpital ont démontré que leur implication est essentielle. Compte tenu de la nature multidisciplinaire du milieu hospitalier, il est important de comprendre les perspectives des prestataires de soins de santé non pharmaciens. Objectifs: Étudier les points de vue des prestataires de soins de santé non pharmaciens au sujet des pratiques actuelles relatives au congé, des éléments d'un plan de congé efficace et des obstacles perçus à un congé optimal, et, enfin, prendre connaissance des attentes des prestataires à l'égard des pharmaciens au moment du congé. Méthodologie: Cette étude qualitative a utilisé des entretiens avec des informateurs clés, des professionnels paramédicaux et des prescripteurs au Vancouver General Hospital et au North Island Hospital Comox Valley (en Colombie-Britannique). Les participants travaillant principalement dans les services de médecine générale, de médecine familiale ou d'hospitalisation ont été invités à participer. Résultats: Au total, 16 prestataires de soins de santé ont participé, 12 professionnels paramédicaux et 4 prescripteurs. L'analyse thématique des transcriptions des entretiens a permis d'identifier 5 thèmes pour chaque groupe. Les 3 thèmes suivants étaient communs aux deux groupes: obstacles au congé optimal liés aux systèmes; obstacles au congé optimal liés aux patients et à la communauté; et participation et sensibilisation des patients. Pour les professionnels paramédicaux, les thèmes de la priorisation des patients pour le congé et de la communication directe/du travail d'équipe étaient essentiels pour un congé optimal. Les thèmes spécifiques aux prescripteurs étaient les limitations liées à l'infrastructure technologique et l'inefficacité des processus de collaboration existants. Les principales responsabilités attendues du pharmacien à la sortie comprenaient la préparation du bilan comparatif des médicaments et des ordonnances au moment du congé, la résolution des problèmes de coûts liés aux médicaments, l'organisation des aides/outils à l'observance et la fourniture de conseils en matière de médication. Conclusions: D'autres études sont nécessaires pour étudier l'optimisation du processus associé au congé grâce à la mise en Åuvre de protocoles standardisés et d'outils liés aux dossiers de santé électroniques. Les principales responsabilités du pharmacien au moment du congé, telles que perçues par les participants à l'étude, correspondaient à la littérature antérieure.
RESUMO
Background: "Interprofessional Collaboration" is associated with improving the quality of care. The objective of this study was the analysis of the concept of "Interprofessional Collaboration" using a hybrid model. Materials and Methods: A hybrid model was used in order to analyze the concept of "Interprofessional Collaboration." The first phase was the scientific search of texts in all valid electronic databases. The second phase includes fieldwork in which medical, pharmaceutical, and nursing staff were interviewed. Data were collected, reviewed, and analyzed in the third phase. Results: The four main themes extracted in the theoretical phase included: "attributes of individual, team, organizational, and system." In the fieldwork phase, three themes and seven sub-themes were identified: "Dynamism/effectiveness of collaboration, uncertain boundaries of collaboration, advanced organizational culture." In the final phase, with the combination of the results of two previous phases, the final definition of the concept was presented: "A process that brings together systems, organizations and individuals from various professions to achieve common interests and goals. Achieving common goals and interests is influenced by individual, team, organizational, and system attributes." Conclusions: Defining the concept of interprofessional collaboration and identifying its various aspects can be a practical guide for creating and evaluating it in educational and clinical settings.
RESUMO
Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are a commonly prescribed medication, but recent evidence suggests that their long-term use may lead to several adverse events. To address this issue, our study aims to assess patient awareness and pharmacist practices in educating patients about the potential risks associated with prolonged PPI use. Methods: Two questionnaires were developed by researchers and administered in the United Arab Emirates from June to August 2021 to gather insights from patients and pharmacists about the use of PPIs, their knowledge of potential side effects, and their experiences and attitudes toward receiving education about PPI side effects. The patients' knowledge was evaluated based on their cumulative correct answers to questions related to PPI's long-term adverse effects including increased fracture risk and hypocalcemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, hypomagnesemia, and the caution of abrupt withdrawal. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.0 software. Results: Overall, 348 participants with a median age of 40 years participated in the survey, among them, 91 (26.14%) used various forms of PPI with 38% of users taking PPI as over-the-counter drugs. Patients had low knowledge about PPI side effects and their proper discontinuation with a median knowledge score of 0 (Interquartile range: 0-2) and only 22.2% of patients were familiar with at least three out of five asked harms. Those with lower knowledge were more likely to be Emirati compared to other nations (p=0.004) and aged over 30 years compared to their younger counterparts (p = 0.016). Few patients have obtained the relevant information from their physicians (25%) or pharmacists (7%). Inquiring 136 pharmacists, it was shown that the most common education was concerning vitamin B12 deficiency (62.5%) followed by fracture risk (58.09%) yet less than half (48%) of pharmacists instructed patients about the potential risk of hypomagnesemia. Almost all pharmacists (99%) agreed that there is a requirement for additional education on the possible harmful consequences of PPIs. Conclusion: The present study has established that a considerable proportion of PPI users in the UAE lack the necessary awareness about the potential adverse effects of PPI despite their extensive use in this country. The current pharmacist practice is inefficient for inculcating the potential harms of chronic PPI use and they are required to optimize their efforts to educate patients and bridge the knowledge gaps.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Some Japanese patients with cancer pain have negative beliefs regarding opioid therapy. The Japanese version of the Barriers Questionnaire II (JBQ-II) determines barriers to cancer pain management. Few studies reported JBQ-II scores in Japan, and none focused on pharmacists. Accordingly, we aimed to explore the relationship between health care professionals' knowledge of and willingness to use opioids, and their JBQ-II scores. Additionally, the variances in JBQ-II scores among nurses, hospital pharmacists, and pharmacy pharmacists were assessed. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey employed the JBQ-II for nurses and pharmacists in hospitals and pharmacies across Japan. Participants were requested to respond to the JBQ-II concerning their affiliation, knowledge of opioid analgesics, and willingness to utilize these drugs for medical practice. RESULTS: A total of 55 hospital pharmacists, 25 pharmacy pharmacists, and 24 nurses responded to the survey. The group-knowledgeable about medical use of narcotics had significantly lower total JBQ-II scores (25.43, standard deviation [SD]: 15.11) than those had by the group with insufficient knowledge (34.50, SD: 18.41). There was no statistically significant difference in total JBQ-II scores among those willing to use opioids medically. The total JBQ-II scores of hospital pharmacists, pharmacy pharmacists, and nurses were 31.00 (SD: 15.11), 33.96 (SD: 19.25), and 27.21 (SD: 15.56), respectively. However, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Health care professionals in Japan with knowledge about opioids for medical purposes had a significantly lower total JBQ-II score than those with insufficient knowledge. Thus, health care professionals' knowledge plays a crucial role in reducing barriers to using narcotic drugs.
RESUMO
Osteoporosis is a common but sub-optimally managed disease amongst aged care residents. Pharmacists undertaking comprehensive medication reviews is one strategy to improve osteoporosis management. Analysis of pharmacist medication review recommendations has identified common clinical practice issues that can be addressed to optimise osteoporosis management for aged care residents. PURPOSE: This study investigates the prevalence of osteoporosis medicine use amongst Australian aged care residents and explores drug-related problems (DRPs) identified during medication reviews and pharmacist recommendations to resolve them. METHODS: Resident demographics, medications, diagnoses, osteoporosis related DRPs, and recommendations to resolve them were extracted from medication review reports. A mixed methods approach was taken to analysis, involving descriptive statistical analysis and content analysis. RESULTS: Medication review reports relating to 980 residents were collected. Antiresorptive therapies were used by 21.7% of residents, of which 87.2% were prescribed denosumab. Osteoporosis related DRPs represented 14.0% of all DRPs identified by pharmacists. Vitamin D was involved in 55.4% of these DRPs, the remainder concerned antiresorptive therapies (23.4%), medications contributing to osteoporosis (16.3%), and calcium (4.9%). Frequent deviations in practice from aged care clinical guidelines and consensus recommendations concerning vitamin D and calcium were found. DRPs and accompanying recommendations relating to denosumab revealed inadequate monitoring and inadvertent therapy disruptions. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist identified DRPs and recommendations revealed common aspects of clinical practice that can be addressed to improve osteoporosis management for aged care residents. A need to raise awareness of aged care-specific consensus recommendations concerning vitamin D and calcium is evident. Facility protocols and procedures must be developed and implemented to ensure safe and effective use of denosumab.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea, Osteoporose, Humanos, Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico, Osteoporose/epidemiologia, Austrália/epidemiologia, Feminino, Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico, Idoso, Masculino, Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais, Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos, Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos, Vitamina D/uso terapêutico, Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate community pharmacists' attitudes, confidence, practice, knowledge, and barriers towards the management of oral side effects of asthma medications. METHODS: A paper-based questionnaire was developed from previous research, trialled, and validated. Convenience sampling through web search was used to identify pharmacy practices across Cairns, Queensland, Australia. Practices were contacted by email and phone before hand-delivering and collecting questionnaires. KEY FINDINGS: Thirty eight community pharmacist responses were descriptively analysed. Community pharmacists surveyed within the Cairns region feel that it is within their role to help manage the side effects of asthma medications. Many feel this is best conveyed during inhaler dispensing and instruction. Current advice is more prompted rather than preventative. Pharmacists routinely advise patients of mouth-rinsing following inhaler use, however the link to preventing side effects is not clearly communicated. Pharmacists are confident in recognizing and managing common side effects such as oral thrush and dry mouth, but fewer are aware of dental decay and gingivitis. Many identify a lack of guidelines as the largest barrier to providing preventive oral health advice. CONCLUSIONS: Cairns community pharmacists already self-perceive their role in the management of oral side effects of asthma medications. Advice given to patients is practical but does not clearly convey the causative associations between asthma medications and their potential oral side effects. Patient education is prompted more by enquiry rather than a preventative approach. The development of standardized practice protocols and integration within undergraduate degrees or continuing education may benefit the community-pharmacist delivered care.
RESUMO
Discussion regarding burnout in health professionals, including community pharmacists, has grown substantially since the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rapid legislative and societal behavioural changes led to significant global disruption of physical and emotional wellbeing during the pandemic as pharmacists continued to provide care while under unprecedented levels of stress. Community pharmacists have had an essential role in maintaining face-to-face care as the number of COVID-19 diagnoses and deaths rose. Communications emerged from the World Health Organisation which implored long-term changes to healthcare workplaces, including increased access to psychosocial support for employees. Peer support is a unique initiative in that it is low-cost and accessible across many platforms. Its main purpose is to bring people together with shared experiences and can often include people in the same career field or workplace. The feasibility and efficacy of peer support programs have been studied in other professional groups such as nurses and physicians, and also in undergraduate medical students. The conclusions drawn from these studies suggest that involvement in peer support reduced the risk of burnout and increased workplace engagement. In contrast to many other healthcare professionals, community pharmacists often work in relative isolation. Research has shown that younger pharmacists, and those in the earlier stages of their careers, reported feeling stressed, undervalued and supported. They also mentioned a desire for access to a mentoring or coaching program. Following the success of peer support in other cohorts, research is needed to verify if this intervention will similarly benefit early career community pharmacists.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists potentially have an important role to play in identification of frailty and delivery of interventions to optimise medicines use for frail older adults. However, little is known about their knowledge or views about this role. AIM: To explore community pharmacists' knowledge of frailty and assessment, experiences and contact with frail older adults, and perceptions of their role in optimising medicines use for this population. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews conducted between March and December 2020 with 15 community pharmacists in Northern Ireland. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three broad themes were generated from the data. The first, 'awareness and understanding of frailty', highlighted gaps in community pharmacists' knowledge regarding presentation and identification of frailty and their reluctance to broach potentially challenging conversations with frail older patients. Within the second theme, 'problem-solving and supporting medication use', community pharmacists felt a large part of their role was to resolve medicines-related issues for frail older adults through collaboration with other primary healthcare professionals but feedback on the outcome was often not provided upon issue resolution. The third theme, 'seizing opportunities in primary care to enhance pharmaceutical care provision for frail older adults', identified areas for further development of the community pharmacist role. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided an understanding of the views and experiences of community pharmacists about frailty. Community pharmacists' knowledge deficits about frailty must be addressed and their communication skills enhanced so they may confidently initiate conversations about frailty and medicines use with older adults.
Assuntos
Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia, Idoso Fragilizado, Farmacêuticos, Papel Profissional, Humanos, Idoso, Idoso Fragilizado/psicologia, Masculino, Feminino, Irlanda do Norte, Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde, Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde, Entrevistas como Assunto, Fragilidade/psicologia, Fragilidade/diagnóstico, Fragilidade/tratamento farmacológico, Pessoa de Meia-Idade, Adulto, Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We previously reported that pharmacists working in pharmacies don't have enough knowledge and enough experience teaching anaphylaxis (An) and EpiPen use. We administered a questionnaire survey to pharmacists with experience handling EpiPen prescriptions. We investigated the relationship between the questionnaire results and the factors in the pharmacists' background regarding the explanation and guidance to patients. RESULTS: The percentage of pharmacists working in pharmacies who provided guidance using visual information and demonstrations was insufficient. Moreover, this figure decreased after the second guidance session. Objective confirmation of patient understanding was also insufficient. The results indicated that self-examination and participation in drug information sessions were important background factors for pharmacists who provided detailed guidance to patients. DISCUSSION: For appropriate long-term management of their condition, An patients must master the EpiPen technique. Pharmacists' guidance plays a critical role in this regard. A support system should be established for proper instruction of pharmacy patients by improving pharmacists' self-education and other educational opportunities.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia, Educação de Pacientes como Assunto, Farmacêuticos, Humanos, Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico, Inquéritos e Questionários, Epinefrina/administração & dosagem, Feminino, Masculino, Adulto, Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Medication charting and prescribing errors commonly occur at hospital admission and discharge. Pharmacist medication reconciliation, after medicines are ordered by a medical officer, can identify and resolve errors, but this often occurs after the errors have reached the patient. Partnered pharmacist medication charting and prescribing are interprofessional, collaborative models that are designed to prevent medication errors before they occur, by involving pharmacists directly in charting and prescribing processes. In the partnered charting model, a pharmacist and medical officer discuss the patient's current medical and medication-related problems and agree on a medication management plan. Agreed medicines are then charted by the pharmacist on the inpatient medication chart. A similar collaborative model can be used at other points in the patient journey, including at discharge. Studies conducted at multiple Australian health services, including rural and regional hospitals, have shown that partnered charting on admission, and partnered prescribing at discharge, significantly reduces the number of medication errors and shortens patients' length of stay in hospital. Junior medical officers report benefiting from enhanced interprofessional learning and reduced workload. Partnered pharmacist medication charting and prescribing models have the best prospect of success in environments with a strong culture of interprofessional collaboration and clinical governance, and a sufficiently resourced clinical pharmacist workforce.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is associated with the prescription of inappropriate medications and avoidable medication-related harm. A novel pharmacist-led intervention aims to identify and resolve inappropriate medication prescriptions in older adults with polypharmacy. AIM: To conduct a preliminary feasibility assessment of the intervention in primary care, testing whether specific components of the intervention procedures and processes can be executed as intended. METHOD: The mixed-methods study was approved by the New Zealand Health and Disability Ethics Committees and public health agency. Patients from a New Zealand general practice clinic were recruited over 4 weeks to receive the intervention. The preliminary feasibility assessment included measures of intervention delivery, patient-reported outcome measures, and perspectives from ten patients and six clinicians. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively to determine if a full-scale intervention trial is warranted. The study's progression criteria were based on established research and guided the decision-making process. RESULTS: The intervention met the study's progression criteria, including patient recruitment, retention, and adherence to the intervention procedures. However, several modifications were identified, including: (1) enhancing patient recruitment, (2) conducting a preliminary meeting between the patient and pharmacist, (3) supporting pharmacists in maintaining a patient-centred approach, (4) reviewing the choice of patient-reported outcome measure, (5) extending the 8-week follow-up period, (6) allocating more time for pharmacists to conduct the intervention. CONCLUSION: The study found the intervention feasible; however, additional development is required before progressing to a full-scale trial. This intervention has the potential to effectively reduce medication-related harm and improve outcomes for older adults with polypharmacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000268842 Date registered: 11/03/2021.
RESUMO
Introduction: Pharmacists play a pivotal role in ensuring patients are administered safe and effective medications; however, they encounter obstacles such as elevated workloads and a scarcity of qualified professionals. Despite the prospective utility of large language models (LLMs), such as Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), in addressing pharmaceutical inquiries, their applicability in real-world cases remains unexplored. Objective: To evaluate GPT-based chatbots' accuracy in real-world drug-related inquiries, comparing their performance to licensed pharmacists. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, authors analyzed real-world drug inquiries from a Drug Information Inquiry Database. Two independent pharmacists evaluated the performance of GPT-based chatbots (GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4) against human pharmacists using accuracy, detail, and risk of harm criteria. Descriptive statistics described inquiry characteristics. Absolute proportion comparative analyses assessed accuracy, detail, and risk of harm. Stratified analyses were performed for different inquiry types. Results: Seventy inquiries were included. Most inquiries were received from physicians (41%) and pharmacists (44%). Inquiries type included dosage/administration (34.2%), drug interaction (12.8%) and pregnancy/lactation (15.7%). Majority of inquires included adults (83%) and female patients (54.3%). GPT-4 had 64.3% completely accurate responses, comparable to human pharmacists. GPT-4 and human pharmacists provided sufficiently detailed responses, with GPT-4 offering additional relevant details. Both GPT-4 and human pharmacists delivered 95% safe responses; however, GPT-4 provided proactive risk mitigation information in 70% of the instances, whereas similar information was included in 25.7% of human pharmacists' responses. Conclusion: Our study showcased GPT-4's potential in addressing drug-related inquiries accurately and safely, comparable to human pharmacists. Current GPT-4-based chatbots could support healthcare professionals and foster global health improvements.
RESUMO
Introduction: Regular review of patients prescribed opioids for persistent non-cancer pain (PCNP) is recommended but not routinely undertaken. The PROMPPT (Proactive clinical Review of patients taking Opioid Medicines long-term for persistent Pain led by clinical Pharmacists in primary care Teams) research programme aims to develop and test a pharmacist-led pain review (PROMPPT) to reduce inappropriate opioid use for persistent pain in primary care. This study explored the acceptability of the proposed PROMPPT review to inform early intervention development. Methods: Interviews (n = 15) and an online discussion forum (n = 31) with patients prescribed opioids for PCNP and interviews with pharmacists (n = 13), explored acceptability of a proposed PROMPPT review. A prototype PROMPPT review was then tested and refined through 3 iterative cycles of in-practice testing (IPT) (n = 3 practices, n = 3 practice pharmacists, n = 13 patients). Drawing on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA), a framework was generated (including a priori TFA constructs) allowing for deductive and inductive thematic analysis to identify aspects of prospective and experienced acceptability. Results: Patients felt uncertain about practice pharmacists delivering the proposed PROMPPT review leading to development of content for the invitation letter for IPT (introducing the pharmacist and outlining the aim of the review). After IPT, patients felt that pharmacists were suited to the role as they were knowledgeable and qualified. Pharmacists felt that the proposed reviews would be challenging. Although challenges were experienced during delivery of PROMPPT reviews, pharmacists found that they became easier to deliver with time, practise and experience. Recommendations for optimisations after IPT included development of the training to include examples of challenging consultations. Conclusions: Uptake of new healthcare interventions is influenced by perceptions of acceptability. Exploring prospective and experienced acceptability at multiple time points during early intervention development, led to mini-optimisations of the prototype PROMPPT review ahead of a non-randomised feasibility study.
RESUMO
O presente estudo teve como objetivo descrever e analisar as competências gerais, específicas e as dificuldades para a atuação dos farmacêuticos como preceptores. Para isso, foi realizada uma revisão de literatura nas bases de dados eletrônicas PubMed, Web of Science, Embase e Scopus, utilizando artigos publicados sobre competências gerais e específicas dos preceptores farmacêuticos. A busca inicial identificou 355 artigos, dentre os quais 14 atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Foram encontradas como principais competências gerais: habilidade de comunicação, conhecimento, resolução de problemas, desenvolvimento de pensamento crítico e profissionalismo; como específicas: feedbacks, relacionamento interpessoal, atividades baseadas nas necessidades dos alunos, planejamento, expectativa compartilhada e liderança; e foram vistas como principais dificuldades: necessidade de maior qualificação dos preceptores e falta de tempo para exercer as atividades da preceptoria. O conhecimento dessas competências e dificuldades pode contribuir para uma melhor força de trabalho na educação acadêmica e experiencial em farmácia
The present study aimed aimed at describing and analyzing the general and specific skills and difficulties for pharmacists to act as preceptors. To this end, a literature review was carried out in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus, for articles published on general and specific competencies of pharmaceutical preceptors. The initial search identified 355 articles and 14 using articles published met the inclusion criteria. The main general competencies were found to be: communication skills, knowledge, problem solving, development of critical thinking and professionalism; as specific: feedback, interpersonal relationships, activities based on student needs, planning, shared expectations and leadership; and the main difficulties were seen as: need for greater qualification of preceptors and lack of time to carry out preceptorship activities. Knowledge of these skills and difficulties can contribute to a better workforce in academic and experiential pharmacy education
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo describir y analizar las competencias generales y específicas y las dificultades para la actuación de los farmacéuticos como preceptores. Para ello, se realizó una revisión de literatura en las bases de datos electrónicas PubMed, Web of Science, Embase y Scopus, usando artículos publicados sobre competencias generales y específicas de los preceptores farmacéuticos. La búsqueda inicial identificó 355 artículos, dentro de los quales 14 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se encontraron como principales competencias generales: habilidad de comunicación, conocimiento, resolución de problemas, desarrollo de pensamiento crítico y profesionalismo; como específicas: retroalimentación, relaciones interpersonales, actividades basadas en las necesidades de los alumnos, planificación, expectativa compartida y liderazgo; y fueron vistas como principales dificultades: necesidad de más cualificación de los preceptores y falta de tiempo para ejercer las actividades de la preceptoría. El conocimiento de estas competencias y dificultades puede contribuir a una mejor fuerza laboral en la educación académica y experiencial en farmacia
